The New Economics of Advertising

August 11, 2008

Only great minds can read this – Can AI Match This?

Filed under: contextual — Dash @ 4:17 pm

fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too

Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno’t mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproam tnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! 

July 8, 2008

NEWS: Has Twitter just bought itself a business model?

Filed under: contextual — Dash @ 3:48 pm


Has Twitter just bought itself a business model?

Posted by Steve O’Hear @ 7:30 am

Has Twitter just bought itself a business model?A flurry of reports yesterday suggest that Twitter is on the verge of acquiring startup Summize, whose mission “is to search & discover the topics and attitudes expressed within online conversations.”

Right now that translates into a Twitter search engine built on top of Twitter’s public API to enable users to search and track keywords or phrases indexed from Twitter’s public timeline. And, more ambitiously, not just see how often a particular topic gets a mention, but actually ascertain different attitudes and viewpoints, and weight them accordingly.

It’s this technology, says Om Malik, that could pave the way to Twitter finally developing a business model. In particular, Summize’s ability to “geocode public timeline tweets (short messages)”, to allow, for example, “one to find out what people are saying about John McCain in Phoenix vs San Francisco“, that could form the basis of a powerful ad-targeting platform. (ed: confusing surveying with ad targeting.)

Malik explains:

In other words, Summize has come-up with a clever way of peering through Twitter’s vast data stream and finding out what’s hot, where and how. The results are essentially keywords – topic, person or location based – and thus can be used to show contextual advertising next to the pages that show these results. Summize, has thereby developed an ability to monetize conversations without being intrusive. (ed: oxymoron)

And as Malik concludes: “Just as AdSense serendipitously turned Google into a giant cash register, with Summize, Twitter can take first step towards a business model.”

That’s right, Twitter may have bought itself a business model – the holy grail of Web 2.0 :-)


Twitter May Buy Summize

Twitter may buy Virginia-based Summize, a Twitter search engine, says Jason Calacanis. A source close to Twitter says that the two companies have been in discussions around a merger over the last couple of weeks, but won’t comment on whether an actual sale has occurred, or the terms.

The deal certainly makes sense. Unlike rival Friendfeed, Twitter still lacks a search feature. And Twitter has relied on Summize in the recent past to help reduce load on the Twitter API. Summize is also one of (or the only) Twitter partner that has access to their XMPP stream.

Summize employees have recently been spotted at Twitter HQ as well, although that could be explained by the close working relationship.

Summize has raised just $750,000 in an angel round of financing. Twitter has raised over $20 million.

June 28, 2008

NEWS: The next revolution in advertising? Peer39 thinks it’s semantics

Filed under: contextual — Dash @ 3:07 pm
Ed: Context targeting or artificial intelligence?

The next revolution in advertising? Peer39 thinks it’s semantics

Though still arguably in its juvenile stages, the online advertising market has already been through several major technological shifts, with the introduction of behavioral, contextual and demographic targeting for ads. What’s next has been a subject for debate. Several early pioneers have bet that it’s semantic technology, with a company called Peer39.

In stealth mode for the last two years, Peer39 has begun slowly unveiling its product. Like other companies based on semantics and natural language processing, Peer39 claims its software, SemanticMatch, can read content in a way that roughly parallels human understanding.

Where for an advertiser like Coca-Cola, Google would find keywords like “cola” to bring up its ads, and other schemes would look at the age or location of web users, semantics take a more holistic look at a web page, determining the overall subject and tone.

Where keyword advertising might insert an ad because “cola” is used several times on the page, even if the overall topic is unrelated or the writing it negative to cola, semantic technology claims to be able to tell if an ad is really appropriate to the content.

Because of that, Peer39 could be useful for content that changes often and unpredictably — some examples being blogs, forums, news, and especially social media, which I speculated was the company’s target last year. User-generated content has been a particular challenge for advertising networks, so if Peer39 can prove SemanticMatch is effective, it’ll have its work cut out for it. To help prove itself, the company also has a a set of analytical tools based on semantic mapping, which help correlate ad placement to conversion and click-through rates.

It’s likely we’ll see some fast development in this space over the next year or two. Some have been speculating that Microsoft intends to move into the space after we broke the story that it plans to acquire semantic search company Powerset yesterday. Google, also, has been toying with its algorithms, though it’s as tight-lipped as ever. And other companies, like Ad Pepper Media, also say they’re developing semantic ad targeting.

While there seems to be enough money sloshing around for the best contenders to all get a piece, there are enough changes in online advertising, as well as mobile, to keep everything uncertain. VentureBeat contributor Julie Ruvolo wrote a lengthy piece about the view from Madison Avenueearlier this year that’s worth a look.

Peer39’s firepower comes from a set of executives and board members with backgrounds in either semantics or advertising. CEO Amiad Solomon sold a company called IDX to GE, while COO Matthew Goldstein just moved over from advertising giant Tacoda. Another former Tacoda Exec, Daniel Jaye, is on the board, along with Eytan Elbaz, who helped invent Google AdSense and sold Applied Semantics to the search giant.

The New York-based company has taken almost $12 million to date, between an $8.2 million funding we reported in October and a round of over $3 million earlier in the year. Its backers includeCanaan PartnersDawntreader Ventures and former Shopping.com CEO Daniel Ciporin.

May 24, 2008

NEWS: TheRarestWords: Intriguing Semantic SEO Project from Russia

Filed under: contextual, software — Dash @ 4:58 pm


TheRarestWords: Intriguing Semantic SEO Project from Russia

rarest-words-logo.png

A mysterious yet intriguing project from Russia has come across our inbox. It is a search-engine optimization analysis tool for Websites called TheRarestWords. For any given URL, like Microsoft’sor Techcrunch’s, it shows you the rarest keywords on the homepage (i.e., the ones most likely to give your site some search-engine juice), other sites with related keywords, and a list of categories the site would fit under based on those keywords. For Microsoft, some the rare keywords it identifies are “silverlight,” “biztalk,” “onecare,” “skydrive, “popfly,” “ballmer,” and “ozzie.” You can try your site by going to http://therarestwords.com/YOURSITE.com.

rarestwords-1.pngTheRarestWords then tries to tap into crowd intelligence by letting anyone add a 100-character definition for each keyword, which could give it a semantic edge in trying to categorize each site. This could also be gamed pretty easily, but this looks to be just a Web project at this point. It could also be used to create a Wiki dictionary likeLingoz or Wiktionary, but that does not seem to be the focus of the project…

May 23, 2008

NEWS: Publishers Upset with Poor Google AdSense Quality Targeting

Filed under: contextual, publisher — Dash @ 3:16 pm


Publishers Upset with Poor Google AdSense Quality Targeting

What’s worse than having pop-up ads on your website? Having ads on your website that aren’t actually contextual and aren’t properly matching the text of your website to draw in prospects. (Well, maybe it’s not worse, but it’s surely frustrating a lot of publishers.) At WebmasterWorld, incrediBILL says that “[t]here were ads for all sorts of junk linking to sites that didn’t have what it claimed, Amazon affiliates, off topic garbage, even phone company directory listings.” He started trying to weed out the bad ads by hand, but says that his filter list is already full, so it wasn’t easy to do.

Bill is not alone. It seems that a lot of other publishers are starting to filter out up to 90% of new ads that are using the Google AdSense program. Publishers complain that “[a]pparently the targeted ads aren’t quality/relevance checked at all by Google,” which doesn’t make the viability of AdSense a strong one at this time.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.